The Danger of 'My Truth' and Moral Relativism

The phrase "my truth" has become a rallying cry for subjective interpretation, but its implications are deeply problematic. By asserting "my truth," individuals prioritize personal belief over objective reality, creating a framework where conflicting claims cannot be resolved. This aligns with moral relativism, which posits that ethical standards vary by individual or culture, leading to logical inconsistencies.
For example, if one person believes lying is justified for personal gain while another deems it immoral, relativism offers no basis for determining which stance is correct. This lack of accountability can excuse harmful behavior, as seen in cases of honor killings. In the U.S., an estimated 23–27 such killings occur annually, often justified by fundamentalist interpretations of Islam. Perpetrators view their actions as morally correct, while others see them as abhorrent.
Moral and cultural relativism also fail to address broader societal challenges, such as the integration of unassimilated immigrants in Western Europe. These ideologies leave societies without a shared framework to evaluate right and wrong, undermining efforts to resolve conflicts and maintain order.
Both "my truth" and moral relativism face self-referential paradoxes, as their proponents often present them as absolute truths. This erodes the concept of universal standards, leaving societies adrift in a sea of subjective perspectives. Without objective evaluation, the ability to address conflicts and uphold accountability is severely diminished.
In conclusion, while personal experiences are valid, conflating them with truth blurs the line between subjective belief and objective reality. This not only challenges our ability to resolve conflicts but also risks normalizing harmful behavior, leaving societies vulnerable to moral ambiguity.

Published: 8/10/2025