Trump Administration's Climate Rollback Faces Scientific Backlash

The Trump administration has proposed revoking the EPA's endangerment finding, a cornerstone of federal climate regulations, sparking widespread criticism from scientists. The proposal, which disputes the scientific consensus on climate change, relies on a report that cherry-picks data and misrepresents research. Climate scientists have condemned the move, asserting that it ignores overwhelming evidence of human-caused global warming and its dangers. The administration claims that human greenhouse gas emissions are not the sole cause of rising temperatures and that climate models overstate warming impacts. However, studies show models accurately predict warming trends, and observed data confirm rising temperatures linked to fossil fuels. The proposal also argues that increased CO2 benefits agriculture, but experts counter that climate extremes and warming harm crop yields. Energy Secretary Chris Wright defended the approach, advocating for critical thinking in climate science. Yet, scientists warn that questioning established climate science risks public health and the environment. The proposal's dismissal of extreme weather risks and focus on fringe studies highlights a flawed narrative, as evidence shows climate change is already causing severe impacts. Scientists urge policymakers to base decisions on peer-reviewed research, emphasizing the endangerment finding's validity. The administration's stance raises concerns about the future of climate policy and its ability to address urgent environmental challenges.

Published: 7/31/2025