Institute for Energy Research Critiques EPA's Renewable Fuel Standard Changes

The Institute for Energy Research (IER) has submitted a critical comment on the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) proposed changes to the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) for 2026 and 2027. IER argues that the RFS, originally designed to enhance national security by reducing foreign oil dependence, is now outdated and counterproductive. IER supports the EPA's decision to remove renewable electricity from the RFS, as it was not part of the original statutory framework. However, they oppose the reduction of credits for imported biofuels, which they claim will increase imports and undermine the program's national security goals. The U.S. has shifted from being a net importer of oil to a net exporter, rendering the original justification for the RFS obsolete. IER highlights that the EPA's proposed rule fails to address the program's obsolescence, instead continuing to increase volume mandates. This approach, according to IER, ignores market realities and prioritizes special interests over national security. The comment urges the EPA to reassess the RFS, focusing on its original intent and recognizing the significant changes in domestic oil production. IER advocates for reducing the RFS's impact, emphasizing the need to prioritize national security and economic prudence over outdated mandates.

Published: 8/11/2025